Monday, January 31, 2011

National Holiday NSFW

  Monday Is National Breast Appreciation Day. 

  

  

   

Spread the slogan:

  
 

"We stare because we care!"

  
 

 

  

 

 

 

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3391 - Release Date: 01/19/11 19:34:00

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Charlotte Kemp Muhl

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Coconut-Spiked Pork with Quinoa, I found this online somewhere, freaking delicious!

Coconut Spiked Pork with Quinoa

Ingredients

  • 1½ (375 mL) cups reduced-sodium chicken or vegetable stock or water
  • ½ cup (125 mL) coconut milk
  • ¼ cup (50 mL) dry-roasted peanuts
  • 1 tbsp (15 mL) olive oil
  • 12 oz (375 g) pork tenderloin, thinly sliced
  • 2 leeks, white part only, cleaned and sliced (see Notes)
  • 4 cloves garlic, minced
  • 1 chile pepper, minced (see Notes)
  • 2 tsp (10 mL) ground cumin
  • ½ tsp (2 mL) salt
  • Freshly ground black pepper
  • 1 can (14 oz/398 mL) no-salt-added diced tomatoes with juice
  • 1 cup (250 mL) quinoa, rinsed and drained
  • 1 cup (250 mL) sliced green beans

Directions

1. In a blender, combine stock, coconut milk and peanuts. Process until smooth. Set aside.

2. In a skillet, heat oil over medium-high heat for 30 seconds. Add pork, in batches if necessary, and cook until lightly browned, about 1 minute per side. Transfer to a plate and set aside.

3. Add leeks to pan and cook, stirring, until softened, about 5 minutes. Add garlic, chile pepper, cumin, salt and black pepper to taste and cook, stirring, for 1 minute. Add tomatoes with juice and reserved peanut mixture and bring to a boil. Stir in quinoa and green beans and return to a boil. Reduce heat to low. Stir in pork and any accumulated juices. Cover and simmer until quinoa is tender, about 20 minutes.

Notes

To clean leeks: Fill sink full of lukewarm water. Split leeks in half lengthwise and submerge in water, swishing them around to remove all traces of dirt. Transfer to a colander and rinse under cold water.

Use the kind of chile pepper you have on hand. JalapeƱo, long red or green or even habanero (if you only use half) will work well in this recipe.

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Great punchline!

Must read- WARNING........Globe Brand CFL Light Bulb from china !!!!

FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 ;
Received this email.

Below is a picture of a CFL light bulb from my 
bathroom.  I turned it on the other day and 
then smelled smoke after a few minutes.
Four inch flames were spewing out of the side of
the ballast like a blow torch!  I 
immediately turned off the lights.  But I'm 
sure it would have caused a fire if I was not 
right there.  Imagine if the kids had left 
the lights on as usual when they were not in the 
room.I took the bulb to the Fire Department
to report the incident.  The Fireman wasn't
at all surprised and said that it was not an
uncommon occurrence.   Apparently,
sometimes when the bulb burns out there is a 
chance that the ballast can start a fire.  
He told me that the Fire Marshall had issued 
reports about the dangers of these bulbs. 
Upon doing some Internet research,

itseems that bulbs made by “Globe” in China seem 
to have the lion’s share ofproblems.  

Lots of fires have been blamed on misuse of CFL 
bulbs, like using them in recessed lighting, pot 
lights, dimmers or in track lighting.  Mine 
was installed in a normal light socket.
I bought these at Wal-Mart.  I will 
be removing all the Globe bulbs from my house.
CFL bulbs are a great energy saver but make sure 
you buy a name brand like Sylvania, Phillips or 
GE and not the ones from China .  



  PASS 

THIS ON TO YOUR 

FRIENDS............

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Preying on students

Dear friends,

Hundreds of thousands of people go into debt every year enrolling in for-profit higher education programs like DeVry and Argosy — sold on the idea that they’ll graduate with skills that will lead to opportunity and a better life. In reality, many come out with a mountain of debt they can’t pay back and no better prospects at employment.[1]

Thankfully, the Obama administration is trying to rein in the industry that preys on low-income Americans. Their plan is to stop federal financial aid from going to higher ed programs that don't actually help students get jobs and pay off their debt.[2] Not surprisingly, the industry is fighting back hard, despite its atrocious record: their students make up 10% of those in higher ed but 40% of students who stop making payments on their loans.[3]

The Department of Education will make a decision soon on how to regulate this industry — and they’re under huge pressure from industry lobbyists. Will you join me in calling on Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Congress to stand strong and protect the interests and futures of low-income students -- It only takes a moment:

http://act.colorofchange.org/sign/studentdebt/?referring_akid=1868.1173786.NN...

Taking time away from work to get a traditional college education can feel like an impossible proposition for many Americans, and for-profit colleges seem like a quick, flexible way to get ahead. They promise low-income folks the job training it takes to escape poverty.

There’s a catch with these so-called career education programs. Recruiters say the certificates they offer will prepare students for good jobs if they’ll take on huge student loans to enroll. But the schools often leave people deep in debt and with credentials that employers don’t take seriously.[4] Students think they’re doing what it takes to escape minimum wage jobs. They’re actually getting deeper into financial trouble.

It’s an issue that disproportionately affects cash-strapped Black folks who work long hours and for whom higher education at public universities or private, non-profit colleges feels impossible. A quarter of Black Americans with associate degrees get them from for-profit colleges, and 40% of these schools’ alumni are people of color.[5]

When Black folks decide to pursue post-secondary schooling, we’re often the first in our families to do so. And we typically have to navigate a complex process on our own and with limited information. For-profit colleges have bee caught preying on this fact -- misleading students, using deceptive practices, and even encouraging applicants to enter false information on their financial aid forms.[6] Statistics show that people who enroll at for-profit schools are much less able to manage their debt than those who go to non-profit schools.[7]

The Obama administration’s proposed “gainful employment” rule would make sure that students who use federal financial aid to pay for school are able to get jobs after graduating that will allow them to repay their debt. In practice, it would force many for-profit institutions to either lower their tuition or improve their programs. But industry lobbyists are trying to kill the Obama administration’s proposed rule. They argue that for-profit colleges will be unfairly targeted by the regulation — a position that doesn’t hold water. The truth is that certificate programs at both for- and non-profit colleges will be subject to the rule.[8]

Some legislators, including members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are backing up the industry’s claims.[9] They put forth a blame-the-victim argument that says the problem isn’t the programs, its students’ impoverished backgrounds and inability to manage their finances. It’s infuriating, and thankfully that logic is being called out by CBC members Reps. Gwen Moore (D-WI) and Maxine Waters (D-CA) and civil rights organizations including the NAACP, Rainbow PUSH Coalition, the United Negro College Fund, the Thurgood Marshall College Fund, LULAC, National Council of La Raza and United States Hispanic Leadership Institute.[10]

Please join me in calling on the Obama administration and members of Congress to resist industry pressures and regulate higher education programs that don’t serve our communities.

You can add your voice here: http://act.colorofchange.org/sign/studentdebt?referring_akid=1868.1173786.NNjTxn&source=taf

Thanks.

References:

1. http://bit.ly/9I2K0x
2. http://protectstudentsandtaxpayers.org/?page_id=24
3. See reference 2.
4. http://nyti.ms/eanmf5
5. http://diverseeducation.com/article/14154/ (NB: Rainbow PUSH has reversed its position and now supports the DOE’s proposed rule)
6. http://bit.ly/gyJJXi
7. See reference 2.
8. http://bit.ly/fiYn1m
9. http://bit.ly/brG3jT
10. http://protectstudentsandtaxpayers.org/?page_id=215

Additional resources:
http://bit.ly/hdEKJw
http://bit.ly/eBKrU8

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Monday, January 24, 2011

Football Cheerleaders - Must be from a Steelers fan!

FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 ;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You don't have to live in the U.S. to know that FOOTBALL IS KING! But the game wouldn't be complete without the cheerleaders, and here are some of footballs finest:

              The New Orleans Saints Girls!

                                          

                    The Atlanta Falconettes

                                           

                  The Green Bay Packer Gals
                                                            

                                               

 

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Fender skirts Blasts from the past!

>             *FENDER SKIRTS*
>             I know some of you will not understand this message, but I
>             bet you know someone who might. I came across this phrase
>             yesterday. *_'FENDER SKIRTS._*_'_
>
>
>             A term I haven't heard in a long time, and thinking about
>             'fender skirts' started me thinking about other words that
>             quietly disappear from our language with hardly a notice
>             like *_'curb feelers.'
>             _**
>             *
>
>             And 'steering knobs.' (AKA) ?~*_suicide knob_*,? ~*_neckers
>             knobs_*.?
>
>
>             Since I'd been thinking of cars, my mind naturally went that
>             direction first.
>
>             Any kids will probably have to find some older person over
>             50 to explain some of these terms to you.
>
>             Remember *_'Continental kits_*? 'They were rear bumper
>             extenders and spare tire covers that were supposed to make
>             any car as cool as a Lincoln Continental.
>
>
>             When did we quit calling them *'emergency brakes?' *At some
>             point 'parking brake' became the proper term. But I miss the
>             hint of drama that went with 'emergency brake.'
>
>
>             I'm sad, too, that almost all the old folks are gone who
>             would call the accelerator the 'foot feed.' Many today do
>             not even know what a *clutch** *is or that the *dimmer
>             switch** *used to be on the floor.
>
>
>             Didn't you ever wait at the street for your daddy to come
>             home, so you could ride the *'running board'** *up to the house?
>
>
>             Here's a phrase I heard all the time in my youth but never
>             anymore -*'store-bought.'** *Of course, just about
>             everything is store-bought these days. But once it was
>             bragging material to have a store-bought dress or a
>             store-bought bag of candy.
>
>
>             'Coast to coast' is a phrase that once held all sorts of
>             excitement and now means almost nothing. Now we take the
>             term 'world wide' for granted. This floors me.
>
>
>             On a smaller scale, *'wall-to-wall'** *was once a magical
>             term in our homes. In the '50s, everyone covered his or her
>             hardwood floors with, wow, wall-to-wall carpeting! Today,
>             everyone replaces their wall-to-wall carpeting with hardwood
>             floors. Go figure.
>
>
>
>
>
>             When was the last time you heard the quaint phrase *'in a
>             family way*? 'It's hard to imagine that the word 'pregnant'
>             was once considered a little too graphic, a little too
>             clinical for use in polite company, so we had all that talk
>             about stork visits and 'being in a family way' or simply
>             'expecting.'
>
>             Apparently *'brassiere'** *is a word no longer in usage. I
>             said it the other day and my daughter cracked up. I guess
>             it's just 'bra' now. 'Unmentionables' probably wouldn't be
>             understood at all.
>
>             I always loved going to the *'picture show,'** *but I
>             considered 'movie' an affectation.
>
>
>             Most of these words go back to the '50s, but here's a pure
>             '60s word I came across the other day *'rat fink.** **'*Ooh,
>             what a nasty put-down!
>
>
>             Here's a word I miss -*'percolator.'** *That was just a fun
>             word to say. And what was it replaced with 'Coffee maker.'
>             How dull... Mr. Coffee, I blame you for this.
>
>
>             I miss those made-up marketing words that were meant to
>             sound so modern and now sound so retro. Words like
>             *'DynaFlow'** *and *'Electrolux.' *Introducing the 1963
>             Admiral TV, now with *'SpectraVision!'
>             *
>
>             Food for thought. Was there a telethon that wiped out
>             *lumbago*? Nobody complains of that anymore. Maybe that's
>             what *castor oil** *cured, because I never hear mothers
>             threatening kids with castor oil anymore.
>
>
>             Some words aren't gone, but are definitely on the endangered
>             list. The one that grieves me most is *'supper.'** *Now
>             everybody says 'dinner.' Save a great word. Invite someone
>             to supper. Discuss fender skirts.
>
>
>             Someone forwarded this to me. I thought some of us of a
>             'certain age' would remember most of these.
>
>
>             Just for fun, pass it along to others of 'a certain age.'
>
>
>
>             IF YOU AREN'T OF A CERTAIN AGE, YOU MUST KNOW SOMEONE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Stop secret holds

Dear Friend,

Right now we are facing one of the biggest threats to Senate progress, and, frankly, to democratic Senate elections we've ever faced: Secrecy.

In the next few weeks, the Senate will likely vote on its rules, and whether to stop secret holds. And, as you can imagine, there are many who want to see it fail -- especially all of those who have benefited from the clandestine sabotage we're trying to stop.

Those senators who are still undecided need a push -- and we need you to help us give it to them. And we don't have any time to lose.

Add your name to our call to pass the "Stop Secret Holds" bill. If we can demonstrate overwhelming grassroots support for this bill, we can overcome those who are aligned against us.

The use of "anonymous holds," the arcane procedure that allows a single senator to secretly torpedo any piece of legislation, has skyrocketed in the last few years. And with its rise, our ability to pass strong legislation -- and hold senators accountable for their actions -- has nosedived.

The bill would end this practice by taking the "secret" out of secret holds by requiring every senator who puts a hold on legislation to come out in the open and identify themselves.

Senators who want to hide something are using secret holds at an unprecedented rate. And it is costing us all in very concrete and specific ways.

Click here to visit StopSecretHolds.com, and see half a dozen real-world examples where secret holds have cost us in the last decade. When you see these, you'll see why we need to take action.

These anonymous holds are endangering our ability to get urgently needed legislation through the Senate. But, even more importantly, the practice endangers the very basis of our representative democracy.

In politics, your record is the report card voters use to choose their representatives. If senators are allowed to continue to avoid public scrutiny, we can't hold them accountable. And without accountability, democracy fails.

The era of Senate secret holds must end -- and end now. The American people simply can't wait any longer to know which of their representatives are holding up pieces of legislation.

Join us, and thousands of grassroots supporters: Join the call to pass the "Stop Secret Holds" bill -- sign your name now.

Thank you for your help. Together we can make our democracy stronger, break through the logjam that is blocking progress, and start insisting on transparent accountability.

We're glad you're with us in this fight.

Sincerely,


Claire McCaskill
U.S. Senator
Dick Durbin
U.S. Senator
Sheldon Whitehouse
U.S. Senator

Paid for by McCaskill for Missouri 2012

Paid for by Friends of Dick Durbin

Paid for by Whitehouse for Senate

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Thursday, January 20, 2011

The following is a telephone exchange between a hotel guest and room-service somewhere in the good old U S A today........

The following is a  telephone exchange between a hotel  guest
and room-service somewhere in the  good old U S A today........ 
>
> Room Service :  "Morrin. Roon sirbees."
>
> Guest : "Sorry, I  thought I dialed  room-service."
>
> Room Service: "   Rye . Roon sirbees...morrin! Joowish to oddor
sunteen???"
>
> Guest: "Uh.....  Yes, I'd like to order  bacon  and eggs.."
>
> Room Service: "Ow  July den?"
>
> Guest:  "......What??"
>
> Room Service: "Ow  July den?!?... Pryed, boyud, poochd?" 
>
> Guest: "Oh, the  eggs! How do I like them? Sorry.. Scrambled,  please."
>
> Room Service: "Ow  July dee baykem? Crease?"
>
> Guest: "Crisp will  be fine."
>
> Room Service:  "Hokay. An Sahn toes?"
>
> Guest:  "What?"
>
> Room Service: "An  toes. July Sahn toes?"
>
> Guest: "I.... Don't  think so."
>
> RoomService: "No?  Judo wan sahn toes???"
>
> Guest: "I feel  really bad about this, but I don't know what  'judo wan
sahn toes' means." 
>
> RoomService:  "Toes! Toes!...Why Joo don Juan toes? Ow bow  Anglish moppin
we  bodder?"
>
> Guest: "Oh,  English muffin!!! I've got it! You were saying  'toast'...
  Fine...Yes, an English muffin  will be fine."
>
> RoomService: "We  bodder?"
>
> Guest: "No, just  put the bodder on the  side."
>
> RoomService:  "Wad?!?"
>
> Guest: "I mean  butter... Just put the butter on the side." 
>
> RoomService:  "Copy?"
>
> Guest: "Excuse  me?"
>
> RoomService:  "Copy...tea..meel?"
>
> Guest: "Yes.  Coffee, please... And that's  everything."
>
> RoomService: "One  Minnie. Scramah egg, crease baykem, Anglish  moppin, we
bodder on sigh and copy .... Rye ??" 
>
> Guest: "Whatever  you say.."
>
> RoomService:  "Tenjooberrymuds."
>
> Guest: "You're  welcome"
>

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Protect Prop C and the Renewable Energy Standard

Did you know that the Renewable Energy Standard is being threatened? Despite being supported by the 66% of Missouri voters who voted for Proposition C in November 2008, certain legislators are attempting to used administrative maneuverings in order to protect utility companies from complying with the standards that we already voted on.

I urge you to let your State Senator and Representative know that they should protect, not destroy, Prop C and the Renewable Energy Standard.

To take action on this issue, click on the link below:
http://action.sierraclub.org/site/Advocacy?s_oo=ybCFN2MkiY7kTA35Z8jVSQ..&... If the text above does not appear as a link or it wraps across multiple lines, then copy and paste it into the address area of your browser.
If you no longer wish to receive email messages sent from your friends on behalf of this organization, please follow the link below:
http://action.sierraclub.org/site/TellFriendOpt?action=optout&toe=f0e1a505ce8...

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Monday, January 17, 2011

Stop The Repeal of Health Care Reform

Sent: January 17, 2011 09:04 AM
Subject: Stop The Repeal of Health Care Reform

votevets.org

Dear Daniel,

 On Wednesday, the Majority Leadership in the House will make good on their promise to bring up for a vote a bill that repeals the health care reform law that passed last year.   Let me be clear – a vote for repeal will be a vote to deny many veterans access to affordable health insurance.

 CLICK HERE TO JOIN US IN OPPOSING HEALTH CARE REPEAL

 I understand that the Republican caucus has concerns about the law.  Veterans have concerns too - like the concern that many who have seen Veterans Affairs care expire cannot afford health insurance; like the concern that many more coming home in a tough economy may find it difficult to find a job and/or afford insurance; and like the concern that according to a report from Harvard, an estimated 2,266 veterans died in 2008 because they had no health insurance.

 It’s for those veterans that this new law means so much.  To repeal it would mean that unemployed veterans – the rate of which is 10 percent, and 21 percent among young Iraq and Afghanistan veterans – will lose the access to health care that this law will soon provide.  To repeal it would mean a whole new generation of veterans will come home to struggle to make ends meet, while paying skyrocketing health insurance premiums to unchecked insurance companies.

 CLICK HERE TO STAND WITH VETERANS AND ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE

 We need your voice heard, now more than ever.  Don’t let the House Majority get away with framing this debate as anything other than what it is – a desire to return to the old status quo, which helped insurance companies, and hurt America’s veterans and working families.  Please click above, and join us.

 Sincerely,
Ashwin Madia
Iraq War Veteran
Interim Chairman, VoteVets.org

 Paid for by VoteVets.org Action Fund



VoteVets.org

   

empowered by Salsa

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Friday, January 14, 2011

New Cuba Travel Regulations Announced by the White House

Sent: January 14, 2011 03:43 PM
Subject: New Cuba Travel Regulations Announced by the White House

Latin American Working Group

END THE TRAVEL BAN

Dear Daniel,

Thank you, Mr. President. After this summer’s buzzing rumors regarding some kind of White House action, the Obama Administration has today announced new regulations governing U.S. citizen travel to Cuba. It is a large step forward, and comes in the wake of a disappointing missed opportunity by the Congress to change the law. We congratulate the White House on their forward-looking decision. And we congratulate all of you for the hard and dedicated work you contributed to this achievement. Thank you, Cuba Advocates!

Here’s what we understand new travel regulations will do (check out our blog on www.lawg.org next week for specifics and/or revisions):

•    Expand purposeful travel by providing general licenses for religious, educational/academic, and cultural travel to Cuba;
•    Provide specific licenses for people-to-people travel similar to the licenses that were provided from 1999-2003;
•    Allow for non-family remittances of $500/quarter for private entrepreneurial activities, cultural activities, etc. – such remittances may not be provided to senior members of the Cuban government or members of the Communist Party; and
•    Expand charter flights from the United States to include all U.S. international airports (i.e. all U.S. international airports may apply to have charter flights depart from their site).

Last August, rumors circulated among major news sources, such as TIME Magazine, New York Times, Miami Herald, and Bloomberg News that expanding travel regulations to allow for people-to-people travel was on the horizon. The rumors have now been put to rest, and we can soon anticipate expanded travel opportunities once the regulations are published in the Federal Register (in a couple of weeks) and after a two-month comment period has been completed. We clearly see this announcement by the White House as very positive step in the right direction, and we look forward to a surge in travel to Cuba and a move to encourage the Congress to finish the job and actually change the law. 

More contact between citizens from our two countries serves the interests of everyone. We should all take time to celebrate this action by the Obama Administration, and let’s begin making our travel plans! We hope that soon the Congress will see the wisdom of taking further steps to open travel to Cuba for ALL U.S. citizens.

Sincerely,

Mavis, Paulo and Emily
(The LAWG Cuba Team)

Latin America Working Group
424 C Street NE, Washington, DC 20002     Phone: (202) 546-7010     Email: lawg@lawg.org
 

Find Us

Twitter Facebook Flickr MySpace Change.org
empowered by Salsa

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Old, but still funny...

Please note  the last one

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Old, but still funny....

 

Someone had to remind me, so I'm reminding you too.

Don't laugh... it's all true...

 

 

Perks of reaching 50 or being over 60 and heading towards 70!

 

01. Kidnappers are not very interested in you.

 

02. In a hostage situation you are likely to be released first.

 

03. No one expects you to run--anywhere.

 

04. People call at 9 PM and ask,"did I wake you?"

 

05. People no longer view you as a hypochondriac.

 

06. There is nothing left to learn the hard way.

 

07. Things you buy now won't wear out.

 

08. You can eat supper at 4 PM.

 

09. You can live without sex but not your glasses.

 

10. You get into heated arguments about pension plans.

 

11. You no longer think of speed limits as a challenge.

 

12. You quit trying to hold your stomach in no matter who walks into the

room.

 

13. You sing along with elevator music.

 

14. Your eyes won't get much worse.

 

15. Your investment in health insurance is finally beginning to pay off.

 

16. Your joints are more accurate meteorologists than the national weather

service.

 

17. Your secrets are safe with your friends because they can't remember them

either.

 

18. Your supply of brain cells is finally down to manageable size.

 

19. You can't remember who sent you this list.

 

20. And you notice these are all in Big Print for your convenience.

 

 

Here's an additional tip...

Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the

same night!

 

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Monday, January 10, 2011

Check out the People For the American Way website!

A message from Daniel Perez perez61@windstream.net.

Support Sheriff Dupnik, and sign!

Please visit People For the American Way today!

If the text above does not appear as a clickable link, you can visit the web address:

../site/SPageServer?pagename=Sheriff&s_oo=EwKoutxKJ_Gziy5hGDvvRg..

If you no longer wish to receive email messages sent from your friends on behalf of this organization, please click here or paste this URL into your browser: http://site.pfaw.org/site/TellFriendOpt?action=optout&toe=f0e1a505ce847d8...

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

From the office of Congressman Todd Akin: Climate change

Sent: January 10, 2011 09:09 AM
Subject: From the office of Congressman Todd Akin

 

 

Dear Daniel:

Thank you for expressing your thoughts regarding the EPA's use of the 1970 Clean Air Act to control greenhouse gas emissions.  I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns.

Climate change is a hot topic in the scientific and political communities. It is increasingly important to the American people as well. As a member of the House Science and Technology Committee, I have participated in hearings on global warming, its causes and possible effects.

Although not all members of the scientific community agree, there seems to be a growing consensus that the planet has experienced a general warming trend, estimated at just over one degree in the last hundred years. However, satellite data also indicates that temperatures at moderate altitudes have fallen since 1979. According to the National Academy of Science (NAS), there is considerable uncertainty as to whether human activities contribute significantly to global warming.

While some believe increased levels of CO2 in our atmosphere are a major factor in planetary warming trends, others observe that the sun is the primary influence on our planet's temperature. They note that increases in solar luminosity have contributed to our global warming trend. Still others suggest that our planet has gone through many natural heating and cooling cycles over the last thousand years.

In fact, recent evidence suggests that global warming may have slowed. 3,000 deep sea robots, deployed to study global warming trends have reported that oceanic temperatures appear to have dropped slightly, rather than risen, over the last five years.

Debates and research are ongoing as to the causes, effects, and solutions for global warming. Although there is much more for us to learn, I believe that we cannot wait until we have all the answers to take common-sense steps to reduce CO2 emissions, especially when we can do so without harming our economic stability.

We have a profound responsibility to protect our planet from avoidable environmental harm.   That is why I support research into carbon neutral technologies.  For example, I support the development of emission-free nuclear technology, hydrogen cell technology and other cutting-edge innovations.  But even with alternative technology there is some uncertainty as to our ability to significantly reduce global emissions, especially with increased emissions being produced by China, India and other developing countries. China is, in fact, the leading producer of carbon emissions globally.

Under the banner of combating global warming, some politicians have proposed massive tax increases and tens of billions of dollars in unfunded mandates on states and private corporations.  Such legislation would increase household energy prices by 60-80% and cost millions of American jobs.  Domestic businesses would be forced to absorb a massive regulatory burden not imposed on similarly situated businesses in other countries, placing the United States at a severe economic disadvantage.

Ultimately, I remain committed to a common-sense approach to global warming concerns, balancing economic and environmental outcomes. For that reason, I will not support policies that needlessly hamstringing America's economy with no guarantee of rolling back global warming trends.

I appreciate the time you took to share your thoughts with me. It is a privilege to represent you. Please visit my website, where you can find more information on current issues, share further thoughts with me via email and subscribe to my e-newsletter for updates on issues you care about. If you have further questions regarding these or other issues facing our nation, please feel free to contact my office.


Sincerely,

Todd Akin
Member of Congress

Join our online community!

 
Facebook  
 Twitter  
 YouTube  
E-Newsletter  
Please feel free to visit my website at http://akin.house.gov/ to contact me and let me know the issues that concern you.

 

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Giffords Shooting Attack on Us All: NOW Calls on Right Wing to Disavow Violence and Hate Speech

Trouble reading this email? View it online

NOW Press Release

For Immediate Release
Contact: Mai Shiozaki, 202-628-8669, ext. 116

Rep. Giffords Shooting is an Attack on All of Us:
NOW Calls on Right Wing to Disavow Violence and Hate Speech
Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill

January 8, 2011

NOW condemns the tragic shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) that stole six lives and seriously injured 12 today. We condemn, equally, the culture of hate and violence increasingly reflected in extreme right-wing opponents of those who support progressive solutions to our country's challenges.

Rep. Giffords, whose office was vandalized after she voted for the federal health care reform law last year, was also named on Sarah Palin's "Targeted" list. Giffords (who has been consistently endorsed by NOW's PAC) herself understood the not-so-well veiled threat, stating "the thing is that the way she [Palin] has it depicted, we're in the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize that there are consequences to that action."

The pious condemnations we are now hearing by right-wing leaders are of little comfort if not accompanied by concrete action. Conservatives cannot have it both ways, screaming sexist, racist and homophobic slurs at legislators as they vote for health care reform, putting legislators on a violence-inciting "Targets" list, and then simply saying how sorry they are when someone explodes into murder.

In November 2009, as Democratic women spoke on the House floor about how the Affordable Care Act would benefit women, Republican Congressmen shouted them down. Led by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who repeatedly yelled "I object. I object. I object. I object. I object," as Rep. Lois Capps (D-Calif.) tried to talk, they carried on this attack for half an hour.

In March 2010, Tea Party supporters screamed a racial epithet at Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) as he walked toward Congress from a health care reform meeting. Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.) was walking with Lewis and confirmed the protesters were yelling "Kill the bill, kill the bill," when they used the racial epithet. One man spit on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) as he walked to the Capitol. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) was taunted with anti-gay epithets as he left the same meeting in a House office building.

We call on Republican leaders to do more than disavow hatred, hostility and violence-laden speech as a political tool. We also call upon the Justice Department to investigate -- to the fullest extent of federal anti-terrorist legislation -- reports that this mass murder, which included the killing of a federal judge and the attempted assassination of a member of Congress, was part of a conspiracy.

NOW offers our sincere condolences to the families of those who were slain, and we hope that all those who were injured will soon recover. Our thoughts are with all those involved in this horrible tragedy.

###

NOW.org | Press Room | Support NOW's Work

Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe to NOW's emails.

You are receiving this email because you are a part of the NOW community.

© 2010 National Organization for Women  |  1100 H Street NW, 3rd Floor  |  Washington, DC 20005

empowered by Salsa

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Investment Plan

Investment Plan

 

 

 If you had purchased $1,000 of shares in Delta Airlines one year
ago, you would have $49.00 today!

If you had purchased $1,000 of shares in AIG one year ago, you would
have $33.00 today.

If you had purchased $1,000 of shares in Lehman Brothers one year
ago, you would have $0.00 today.

But, if you had purchased $1,000 worth of beer one year ago, drank
all the beer, then turned in the aluminum cans for recycling refund,
you would have received a $214.00.

Based on the above, the best current investment plan is to drink
heavily & recycle.  It is called the 401-Keg.

A recent study found that the average American walks about 900 miles
a year. Another study found that Americans drink, on average, 22
gallons of alcohol a year. That means that, on average, Americans get
about 41 miles to the gallon!

Makes you damned proud to be an American!!!    http://images.Quebles.com/hotmail/emoticons/1511759.GIF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous

Monday, January 3, 2011

WHEN YOU GO TO THE BEACH

  When you go to the beach,

you should always follow an important rule:

 


 

 

*NEVER!**NEVER! *

*NEVER!*


*NEVER!**NEVER! *
*NEVER!*


 *NEVER!*    *NEVER!*  *NEVER!*


*NEVER!*
*NEVER!*
*NEVER!*
rub suntan lotion on someone you do not know


 

 Unless you like surprises!


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3299 - Release Date: 12/05/10

 

----- End forwarded message -----

Posted via email from danny6114's Pre- posterous